-----Original Message-----
From: <Gtjacobs079>
Sent 4/28/2008 6:15:47 PM
To: cathy@stopncannexation.com
Subject: Annexation Battle
lets stop and have the law changed to stop annexation throughout
north carolina. if not i have money put aside and can afford the
annexation. but i will fight to death to have it stopped
-----Original Message-----
From: "Keith and Sherry Bost"
Sent 4/23/2008 8:49:39 PM
To: "'Rep. Bruce Goforth'" <bruceg@ncleg.net>
Cc: <Larrybr@ncleg.net>, <Nelsond@ncleg.net>, <Edgars@ncleg.net>,
<Trudiw@ncleg.net>, <Earlj@ncleg.net>
<Jerry@ncleg.net>, <Billo@ncleg.net>, <Joeb@ncleg.net>,
<Hughh@ncleg.net>, <Pauls@ncleg.net>, <RayneBrown@triad.rr.com>
Subject:
Representative Goforth,
I wanted to thank you and the study commission from the bottom
of my heart for your wisdom in offering the bill for moratorium
on forced annexations. Although it will probably be too late to
help us here in Davidson County even if it does pass, I know
that there are so many besieged neighborhoods and communities in
North Carolina whom it may help that it would be selfish of me
not to offer my thanks, and the thanks of all of us who would
lament seeing others suffer the same fate that we will. We are
not, as the cities claim, mean or selfish, and we appreciate
what you have proposed and pray that it will help others. Please
let us know what we can do, as citizens, to help you get this
wise and discretionary bill passed.
Thanks again, Keith Bost and neighbors
– Davidson
County
-----Original Message-----
From: "mariesthename"
Sent 4/23/2008 8:45:18 AM
To: Cathy@stopncannexation.com
Subject: Re: letterThank you so much, Cathy.
Am sending the following letter, via snail mail, to every Senator
in NC's Senate:
************************
Good Day,
I am writing to you because I
can get no answers from the committee that is supposedly addressing
a problem that is wreaking havoc statewide.
As you know, North Carolina,
Tennessee, Idaho, and Kansas are the only states that allow forced
annexation at will by cities. Louisiana, Illinois, and Oregon allow
it only in limited cases. It should not be allowed at all, for it
deprives citizens of their right to vote on something that
drastically affects their future.
You also know that there is
much outrage at the North Carolina Senate for failing and refusing
to address the unjust law that has remained in effect since 1959.
There are no checks and balances to take away the absolute power
that this law furnishes to City Councils who look only to their own
will for guidance, thus inviting corruption and abuse.
Are you aware, or do you even
care, that the League of Municipalities is taking full credit for
having stalled 24 bills, which have been in the hands of your Ways
and Means Committee since February 2007, for the reform of this law?
Aren’t you tired of the League’s spoon fed pabulum of “because areas
become urbanized, they need to share in the cost of the city
infrastructure so that the city can grow and become a vibrant city”?
If forced annexation is the
only means whereby a city can grow, then the leaders of that city
are lacking in brain power!
And look at the problems
forced annexation causes: sprawl, lack of adequate police
protection, forcing people to live beyond their means with resulting
foreclosures on homes that in turn affect the real estate market, a
very uncooperative and vengeance minded citizenry, and a tremendous
waste of time, talents and money that could be used for better
purposes than filling our overcrowded courts with lawsuits fighting
a law that should not be allowed to stand.
I would
specifically like to know if Senator Andrew Brock’s Bill
DRS75044-LBx-104 is still being considered? Or was it ever
considered? It was turned over to the Ways and Means Committee over
a year ago.
Will you please give me some
answers.
A very concerned citizen, who
always votes when a vote is allowed,
Marie Howell
-----Original Message-----
From: "Keith and Sherry Bost"
Sent 4/18/2008 10:07:10 PM
To: Bruceg@ncleg.net, Paull@ncleg.net,
"'Representative Larry R. Brown'" <Larrybr@ncleg.net>,
"'Representative Nelson Dollar'" <Nelsond@ncleg.net>,
"'Representative Earl Jones'" <Earlj@ncleg.net>, Louisp@ncleg.net,
"'Representative Edgar V. Starnes'" <Edgars@ncleg.net>, Fredst@ncleg.net,
"'Representative Russell E. Tucker'" <Russellt@ncleg.net>,
"'Representative Trudi Walend'" <Trudiw@ncleg.net>
Cc:
Subject: You were lied to...
I
hope you remember that I pointed out to you that the claims made
(by mayor pro-tem beck and the assistant city manager Carson
from Lexington) were false, and below is the actual cost of the
sewer that they claimed was “given” to the County school from a
selfless “civic duty”. You will find it interesting. I find it
unimaginable that City councilmen would have the audacity to lie
to the State Representatives, but we here are used to being lied
to (and about) by the city of
Lexington. I know such propagandized,
twisted, and outright avoidance of the truth is common to most
if not many Municipal officials and councils.
Keith,
Enclosed is the information
you requested concerning the sewer expenditure paid by the
County for the West Davidson Sewer Project. Hope this
helps.
Larry Potts, Chairman
Davidson
County
Board
of Commissioners
Total cost was $1,708,993.15.
The easements were $118,534.00
The capacity charge to City of
Lexington
was $28,991.78.
Larry
Potts would be honored to answer any of your questions
concerning this matter.
The city of
Salisbury, our neighbor, backed away from
its’ plans to annex after finding that the people there
requested sewer. Nothing more clearly illustrates the fact that
these cities have NO INTENTION of providing service in a timely
manner, and that the cities are annexing simply in order to
gather tax revenue while taking all the time they want in
providing the “promised” services.
Our own City Community Director,
Tammy Keply, recently stated in an interview (the Lexington
Dispatch) that the “city has two years to provide trunk lines”.
Lexington
has NO intention of providing anything else. We will have the
same fire protection and water service. We have our own
streetlights and everything else we want or need. We also have
eight people who will lose their homes here, so please declare a
moratorium on annexations before this happens.
Thank you very much, Keith Bost
and neighbors.
-----Original Message-----
From: "Joni"
Sent 8/1/2007 6:00:45 PM
To: Cathy@stopncannexation.com
Subject: Re: Annexation Reform Study
|
..... I am afraid all of this means
nothing to me now since we were FORCED
into annexation in Winston-Salem....all I see is more
taxes to pay and free garbage pickup......we used to
take it to the landfill ourselves and it didn't cost me
as much as my NEW TAXES are costing me!!!! God
only knows what I will do when they come through with
sewer (if I live that long)....how in the heck can I pay
for that road frontage at my age (62).....and don't need
it or want it in the second place. Not to mention the
darn street lights shining into my bedroom windows now.
Oh, yeah, I love living in the city about as much as I
enjoy a migraine.
Joni Tilley
If you don't mind, I would like to share your email
about how annexation has hurt you
with legislators as we continue to
talk to them.
Cathy Heath
|
Cathy, you go right ahead and tell those "people" how it
has hurt me...not helped. We moved
to the county because it was the
COUNTY......if we had wanted to live
in the city we would have done so.
There are no, I
repeat NO, advantages to be annexed
other than they get more taxes from
us. Let me interject that we are
making payments now on the property
taxes for 2006 since we just don't
have that kind of money...and here
it is time to file City-County taxes
for this year. Where am I gonna get
another thousand!!! I didn't care
for garbage pick up for free (NOT
really free now is it), I didn't
want street lights; the country is
that because of the near feeling of
nature and peace and quiet; the
sheriff's department did a fine job
of protecting us and was here on the
spot when you needed them; we waited
an hour a couple of weeks ago when
there was an automobile accident
right here in my yard....when I
called 911 the operator said "hold
on and I will get the highway patrol
for you" (which tells me their
records are not up to date)...I told
him "No, that we are the last house
in the lovely City Limits and we
need the police."....took close to
an hour. Now that was helpful, huh?
If I thought it would
do any good at all I'd vote next
time for anyone that was opposing
anyone in office....city, county and
federal and state just to get
those out that did this to
us. And my vote would not
be for necessarily the best
candidate. I'd vote for the opposer
simply because they were not the one
in office when this robbery took
place. Robbery is a grand way of
explaining it. They robbed me of
what I had, and took much more away,
as a thief does. They (a thief)
doesn't give you anything; the thief
takes it from you. They are all
thieves. Each and every one. So
much for the American way. And
don't get me started on illegals....the
key word being illegal.
Whew. I guess I
STILL need to vent! Thanks for
listening. I wish you the best in
this task....but it is very
difficult to make the government
listen to us...and they are supposed
to listen. They are supposed to be
our voices and represent us and do
what the majority wishes....that
doesn't happen. Lobbyists take care
of that. All I ever wanted was the
opportunity to vote on this matter
but that won't happen because "they"
know that if this ever goes to a
public vote, there will never, ever
be an annexation in this country!!
Most sincerely,
Joni Tilley
|
|
-----Original Message-----
From: "gloria mc"
Sent 3/15/2008 6:42:35 PM
To: Cathy@stopncannexation.com
Subject: Re: SNCA Update & Action Alert
Hi Cathy!
Thanks for all the updates and important information.
Below is an email I sent to all the committee members last
week:
****************
To- Member of the Annexation
Study Committee:
As a resident living in an
area that the City of Asheboro is targeting for
annexation, I would like you to consider the
implications and repercussions of the present NC
Annexation Laws:
In order for the City of
Asheboro to annex our area, known as Dave's Mountain,
the City of Asheboro will spent finite tax revenues to
do so.
Our area is heavily wooded,
and VERY rocky, meaning that this will be a VERY
expensive project which will take many, many years to
pay for -in which there will be considerable blasting,
calling for expensive insurance to cover homeowner's
losses, especially to cracked foundations and bringing
in expensive equipment to deal with the rock.
The citizens of Asheboro will be financing this foolish
venture, with no benefit for the city of Asheboro
residents for 20 - 30 years! This is a debt that will
be passed on to our children and grandchildren - and yet
the taxpayers of the City are completely in the dark
concerning this foolhardy plan.
This is how the City of
Asheboro plans to finance this non-voted debt:
- Using $3-1/2 million dollars
of Asheboro taxpayer money, now in reserves, to help pay
for Dave’s Mtn. Sewer installation
- Requiring the Asheboro
taxpayer, to assume this sewer debt and spend tax
revenues to pay a 20+ year debt*
- Raising water and sewer
rates to help finance this debt
*This is based
on the cost estimate of the project. When the
construction bids are submitted, the cost will most
likely be higher according to local sewer installers
in our area!
The City has manipulated
costs and put out a rosy scenario (20 yrs?) so that
this project will look less ridiculous. FYI: To
understand how the City has manipulated this whole
process, the branch manager of an engineering firm
located in Asheboro was the same gentleman
that headed up the City's Task Force on Annexation -
who promoted this City Annexation and then his
company was awarded engineering contracts for over
1/2 million dollars with no other bids taken! [A
Formal Complaint has been filed with the Board of
Professional Engineers and they are now
investigating this blatant Conflict of Interest,
between the City and the engineering firm]
If
I were a taxpayer in the City of Asheboro - I would be
knocking down the doors of City Hall saying, "Don't
spend my taxes like this! This is stupid and foolish -
especially in this time of economic downturn!!"
But.......as I am sure all
of you are aware ......I, my children, and grandchildren
are being forced to assume this ridiculous debt, with
no voice or vote in the matter!!
This, Committee Members, is
what is wrong with the current NC Annexation Statutes.
Gloria McClanahan
Randolph County
PS - There are two areas
closer to the city than we are who have asked
to be annexed and the City has told them that it
would be a 10 year pay back which does not make it a
prudent financial undertaking for the city!!
-----Original Message-----
From: "BOYD PARKER"
Sent 3/19/2008 8:29:25 PM
To: cathy@stopncannexation.com
Subject: Annexation information
Dear Sir,
My name is Boyd Parker in a small town here in NC that is truly
fighting against force annexation here in Bolton nc, We have
been annex in a small town that has nothing too offer there
people. We as the people in this small community, are wonder how
can we not only fight, but win this horribly battle that we are
in......
With in this community we are in there are a low percentage that
have jobs, most of the people are retired or on disability and
the town board think from the heart that he can walk all over
these people... IT'S not fair and it's not right...We not only
want to join the fight, we are asking for what ever advise that
you can give in this long drawn out struggle. Thank you and
please contact me at any time.
BOYD PARKER......
-----Original Message-----
From: "larry wright"
Sent 3/21/2008 3:28:05 PM
To: Cathy@stopncannexation.com
Subject: Re: Information Asheville March 18 meeting
Hi Cathy,
Thank you for the info you
sent. Four of us from Rowan County attended and spoke at
the Asheville meeting. The other three were all county
commissioners.
We should have a much larger
group from Rowan County at the April 9 meeting in Raleigh -
maybe a bus full.
I'm not good with attachments so
here is my 3 minute speech:
"Committee members, I appreciate the opportunity to
speak.
I have three points. The first one is that Salisbury
and other cities make the argument that
they must use forced annexation in order to grow. Let
me ask: Must Rowan county annex
surrounding counties in order to grow? Must North
Carolina annex surrounding states in order
to grow? Clearly the answer to both questions is NO.
Both Rowan County and our State will grow by
effectively and efficiently governing within their
current borders. Salisbury and other cities can and
should do the same.
My second point is that forced annexation is
wasteful. Salisbury will spend millions of tax
dollars duplicating services already provided by our
own personal funds. Do you really think
this duplication of services is a wise use of tax funds?
We have learned recently how valuable water really
is. If annexed, Salisbury will have to
pump more water from the Yadkin River and we will have
to disconnect our wells. Is wasting this
valuable water resource wise in a time of severe
draught? Future draughts may be worse.
Millions of dollars in tax funds and private funds are
being spent in costly ligation as agrieved
citizens and cities fight over forced annexation. This
waste can be avoided if the law is changed.
My third point is this current annexation law should be
changed because it tramples on the
rights of North Carolina citizens. It subjects us to
taxation without representation. It allows
cities to force themselves upon us. We county residents
outside the cities can not vote for the
city councils that impose on us heavy taxes and fees
that could run as high as $10,000 when
utilities are connected. On the state level, We have
the right to vote for those making the
laws that affect us. We should have the right on the
local level to vote on annexation, separate
from the city, before being annexed.
You have it within your power to change this outdated
and oppressive law and give back to us
the rights that were taken away in 1959. Once
slavery was legal in our state. But slavery was
wrong. Segregation was legal. But segregation was
wrong. Just because forced annexation is
legal does not make it right. Just as we have changed
the other oppressive laws that were wrong,
we should do the same to the current annexation law.
I urge you to disregard the voices of highly paid
lobbyists and listen instead to
us common ordinary citizens."
Thanks again for your Help, Cathy
Larry Wright
Rowan County
-----Original Message-----
From: "Catherine Smith"
Sent 3/25/2008 9:39:50 AM
To: Eddieg@ncleg.net, Pryorg@ncleg.net, Curtisb@ncleg.net,
Kennethf@ncleg.net
Cc: Marcb@ncleg.net
Subject: Forced Annexation: Heathwood to
Waxhaw...remember Wal-Mart?
Dear Senators Basnight and Goodall and Representatives
Blackwood, Furr and
Gibson:
I am contacting you as a concerned resident and
constituent who lives in the
Heathwood subdivision in an unincorporated portion of
Union County, NC.
We are in a battle to stop the forced annexation of our
community by the
Town of Waxhaw. Despite their assertions to the
contrary, this hostile
takeover is simply a bid for added revenue without
substantive benefit to
our residents. Indeed, they offer us only garbage
collection, unwanted
streetlights and police protection, which is already
adequately provided by
the Union County Sheriff's department.
Such rampant misuse of power is frequent in this state
and must be curtailed
immediately. Your support of HB 86 will send a strong
message to local
municipalities that acquisition by force without
significant advantages for
residents is without merit.
Please help us in this fight, and stop the madness.
With respect,
Catherine Smith
**********************************************
------ Forwarded Message
From: Catherine Smith
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2008 10:15:10 -0400
To:
Conversation: Heathwood to Waxhaw...remember Wal-Mart?
Subject: Heathwood to Waxhaw...remember Wal-Mart?
To Whom It May Concern:
It seems reprehensible to me that the town of Waxhaw
would cherry-pick
properties in order to line their own pockets. The
proposed acquisition of
Heathwood is such a case.
It's obvious to anyone who can read a map that they have
gone out of their
way to string together adjacent properties in order to
acquire Heathwood
within the town fold.
The residents of Heathwood are aware that this strategy
has been attempted
before. It has also been legally challenged and defied
in courts across
this country.
Waxhaw, we helped you fight Wal-Mart and we won. Make no
mistake that our
vigilance in that battle pales in comparison to the
fight you have on your
hands now and the outcome will be the same.
Catherine Smith
Heathwood
John Moore
XXXXXXXXX
New Hill, NC 27562
April 8th, 2008
To: House Select Committee on
Municipal Annexation
While
there is so much potential for municipalities to
create wealth, it is ironic that municipalities in
North Carolina are allowed by law to not only seize
wealth but also destroy it. Municipalities create
wealth by efficiently delivering and selling
services. They seize wealth by compelling purchase
of undesired services. They destroy wealth by
threatening taxes for something of lesser value.
The House should stop forced annexation.
Sincerely,
John Moore
----- Original Message -----
From: stewart smith
Sent: Monday, April 14, 2008 4:13 PM
Subject: annexation
Annexation Committee Members All
I live in an area that is presently under
consideration of annexation in May 2009. I have
never paid attention to the annexation process until
now. After reading general statue 160, I understand
the rub, quite well. In this '50ish Edsel approach I
understand all quite well.
Where are the already given, legal rights of the
citizens to be annexed? Vote for the city council
after they annex you without your given right to a
prior vote. This violates the one man one vote,
Amendment 25 and the civil rights act of 1965. No
referendum allowed prior to annexation either. The
state of NC is in the majority minority of three
states to this approach in the United States of
America. May my God be with you, should a case of
this nature should arise from North Carolina and be
appealed to the United States Supreme Court. This
would cap only a good investagative newspaper
report. The General Statue is so archaic it reminds
me of something that came out of a Chicago "speak
easy" in the 1930's, in the back room.
Our forefathers came here in the early 1600's and
this was one of their main concerns. We should not
have to do this again and I will not. All of
my voting rights for annexing my property have been
taken away by general statue 160, which you are now
accessing the validity of.
Members All, it needs change, which will take time,
careful assessment of all parties and then present a
new plan. This will take time to present an
acceptable statue which will award municipalities
the right to expand, under new rules and at the same
time take into effect the right of citizens to have
a voice and the given right of approval of
access to taxes, utilities, lighting, curbing,
storm drainage in the process prior to annexation,
rather than after.
A requirement must be that each city or town have on
the books a written policy of annexation of services
and when they are to be completed. Note that I am
not talking about a code I am referring to a
"Policy for all county residents" that are not in
the city limits.
Citizens are all, at this time, are living in a
recession, and depending on the level of a citizens
income, the severity. No better time than now to
Stop, Look and Listen as a panel to enforce a
moratorium on annexation and re-write general statue
160. Not all, but some towns, cities are FORCING
annexation at an alarming rate to find a way out of
financial distress. Also, they are cherry picking
the area to be annexed. As in our situation here, we
are being asked to buy the pump for sewer, pay the
electricity to power it and pay to hook up to our
house because the city does not have the money to
place gravity sewer like the rest of the city, and
we live in the most sandy region in the county.
Money wise, that is only $2500.00 to be in a city
that I had no political say so as to whether I
wanted to pay an additional $850. in taxes. Go
figure. They too, are strapped for money. These are
the problems.
Possible answers could be. For sure, do not take a
vote or referendum on forced annexation away from
the people. It should be there already.
The state varies in elevation by a mile or better. I
believe this should figure in a solution of sewer
and water quality. Different avenues of obtaining
electricity. The elevation of Boone and Sea Level
have to be criterion. Cities and towns vary by
numbers, terrain, highways, and what is good for one
is not good for all. As in anything you have the
haves and have nots.
As a committee, you are at fault if you continue to
let "160" be the rule for all. It is not.
The needs in Charlotte are not the exact needs in
Asheville or Ocracoke. Mecklenburg County, and the
city of Charlotte should have absolutely nothing to
do with the needs of people in the rest of the
state. Their needs and their wants are theirs, not
mine.
Divide and conquer the problem using valid
criterion. Listen to each county, not a region. Tape
each one and look at it, at you leisure. You must
get the pulse of ALL the people. Give a list of
committee questions to regional experts of the
chosen criteria of evaluation, in writing or have
them taped.
I believe, you will be surprised in the variations
of the problems of annexation through out the
state of North Carolina. Take your time and get it
right the first time.
The people in North Carolina, should not be pawns,
slaves of a local government when slavery has been
abolished and the right to vote stands as the right
to vote for elected officials of the state, the
county and nation. Municipalities are no
different. Or, are going to say, they are?
Stewart W. Smith
xxxx xxxxxxx St.
Lenoir County
Kinston, NC 28504