From: Keith and Sherry Bost 
Sent: Monday, April 28, 2008 3:21 PM
To: 'Marcb@ncleg.net'
Cc: 'ALL Senators'; 'nchousemembers@ncleg.net'
Subject: I cannot take time to come to Raleigh, so PLEASE read this....

 

 Senator Basnight, I am sure that you are aware that the House Study commission has recently recognized that there is a need to reform if not end the archaic practice of Forced Annexations, and on behalf of all the people in North Carolina I ask for your support of this measure. I live in what was once a quiet, rural County called Davidson, and what was once a friendly and peaceful place has become a battleground of hatred, lies, betrayal and mistrust – all because of forced annexation. We in the county are lied to and about publicly on a regular basis and the lies from our antagonist – the City of Lexington – are the same lies every other town and city across N.C uses to defend THEIR annexations. These towns learn the same excuses from the League of Municipalities, but one size does not fit all when it comes to annexation. Lexington offers us nothing, we want nothing from the town, and we gain nothing except bad things from our unfortunate proximity to the town. We have our own streetlights and garbage service, state-of- the art septic systems, and very capable County Services that can and will provide anything that we might need in the future.

   The City of Lexington will undoubtedly be lobbying you aggressively along with the League of Municipalities, and if history proves repetitive, the Lexington officials will repeat the same mistruths they tired to tell the Davidson County citizens and which the Lexington officials actually had the audacity to repeat to the study commission at the meetings. This oft-repeated lie is that the City of Lexington “gave” West Davidson High School sewer service “out of civic duty”. The truth is that the County installed the sewer lines themselves and paid millions to connect to the city sewer, and like every county citizen or entity pays DOUBLE sewer rates as does city residents. This was a mutually-beneficial, mutually desired arrangement, unlike the City of Lexington using the County landfill, Social Services, Courthouse, Library, and many other County services for which the County receives no special payment. I will include the actual cost from the County as well as Demographic statistics from the City of Lexington’s own website to prove that (1) We receive no benefit from the City of Lexington, and (2) we have NO incentive to want to join the city. We are not greedy, we simply do not want to be under the rule of people who, for over a year now, have derided, maligned, disrespected and lied to and about. Here are the Statistics from Lexington:

Total Population:

19,953

Median Household Income

$26,226

Median House Value

$81,800

Home Ownership

49.8%

Unemployment Rate

4.6%

Citizens Below Poverty

20.9%

 

      Not all of the people being annexed here are wealthy. Several neighborhoods that the city is annexing as a “bridge” to wealthy neighborhoods will be devastated by the double taxes and fees, especially the thousands to “hook up” to the sewer. I will forward you several of the letters that have been in the local paper (the Dispatch) in which good people publicly admit that they will lose everything if and when they are annexed. Is this right? Does N.C want to be on National news as putting people out of their homes in order to feed the incessant greed of small towns like Lexington, or are we willing to admit that changes need to be made to protect both growth and people’s basic rights to their property? Lexington City has a public golf course which looses over $200,000 a year. It has refused offers to sell this golf course, despite the fact that to do so would add tax revenue and eliminate the tax loss. Also, the Mayor of Lexington recently sold at least one of his rental houses to the city – which bought the house (es) from him using tax money. (We have requested this and the annexation information pursuant to the N.C Open Records law and yet the City refuses to give us the information). Is it any wonder that we do not want to join the city, regardless of the taxes?

 I truly believe that we have the intellectual capabilities to do both. Virginia uses the Dillon rule, charges either city or County tax rates (not both), and have some of the most careful, genuine growth and nice cities in the USA without having to resort to forcing citizens to pay double taxes to people they were never allowed to vote for or against and without receiving anything in return for those taxes. From a letter I sent to correct one of the many lies the City of Lexington is telling Davidson County and our Representatives in Raleigh:

 The Mayor and other city employees have claimed publicly that the city “gave” the county sewer to West Davidson High School. Mr. Beck and the ass. City manager had the audacity to make the same misleading claims to House Representatives.

THIS IS THE TRUTH-

. The County installed the sewer line, and paid $1,708,993.15 for it. Easements cost $118,534, and capacity charge (Lexington) is $28,991.78. That is hardly “free” and done for “civic service” as the Lexington politicians claim!

. Every County citizen who may request sewer service pays double sewer fees.

. We hope that in the future the County Commissioners will invest in new septic tanks rather than any mutually beneficial agreements that will give the city reasons to annex in the future. They should also tell the city to find somewhere else to put its garbage (since the landfill is County).

. The Health department, Social Services, County Courthouse, landfill, library, and sheriffs department is ALL County entities.

.Lexington Councilman Victor Kiger claimed (at the public meeting) that Hawaii and Texas were forcefully annexed against their will into the United States. These states VOTED overwhelmingly to become states! And The Louisiana Purchase was a purchase, not an annexation!

 As you can see, the City Council of Lexington has no appreciation for the truth of history or of today, but if history is to teach us anything, it is that we, as a State, need to join the 21st Century.

 

North Carolina has a habit of being on the wrong side of history, and seems to be determined to stay there. When Slavery was the issue, the leaders of this state defended it as an economic necessity, claiming that we could not compete economically without it, and that it was necessary to support the entire state infrastructure. These arguments, to our shame, are the same ones now being used to defend the modern form of slavery called forced annexation.
Forced annexation is an undemocratic form of oppressive tyranny that does not resemble either the spirit nor the letter of our Constitutional form of Government. Without vote, without consideration of the people annexed and without any Democratic debate or Representation townships across this state are misusing an originally flawed and archaic law to force the nearby County residents into neo-slavery by simply taking their hard-earned money through unjustified and unreasonable taxation.
Because County residents are forbidden by law to vote in town elections, this results in the undeniable condition of taxation without representation, and the obligatory “public hearings” are an exercise in futility that only result in further anger and frustration and hatred when the county citizens are invariably ignored and mistreated by the town officials.
The history of Forced Annexation is shamefully redundant. The “public meetings” are held. The county residents plead, protest, and usually spend thousands fighting the annexation. These County citizens fight because of an instinctive sense of moral outrage, not because some legal grey area has been infringed upon or even because they believe that they can win. They always fight because the simple, basic and most fundamental right of an American citizen – the right to VOTE – is being denied to them. They fight because of the insult to their humanity; they fight for a greater principle than most of them are even able to articulate or fully realize. They fight for the same reasons our founding fathers fought the War for Independence. They fight because they know, instinctively, that every American citizen should have the right to choose where to live and whom to pay taxes to.
The League of Municipalities would have everyone believe that those who oppose Forced Annexations are selfish, and that it is only about money. I wonder what the patriots who died for the principles of self-determination and liberty would think of those arguments, or the people across the world today who fight for the right to vote and resent being taxed by tyrants. History is full of tried and failed policies that should show us where policies such as Forced annexation will lead us, and, as William Pitt said, “Necessity is the cry for every infringement upon human liberty; it is the excuse of Tyrants, the creed of slaves”.

 
-----Original Message-----
From: <Gtjacobs079>
Sent 4/28/2008 6:15:47 PM
To: cathy@stopncannexation.com
Subject: Annexation Battle

 
lets stop and have the law changed to stop annexation throughout north carolina. if not i have money put aside and can afford the annexation. but i will fight to death to have it stopped
 

-----Original Message-----
From: "Keith and Sherry Bost"
Sent 4/23/2008 8:49:39 PM
To: "'Rep. Bruce Goforth'" <bruceg@ncleg.net>
Cc: <Larrybr@ncleg.net>,  <Nelsond@ncleg.net>,  <Edgars@ncleg.net>,  <Trudiw@ncleg.net>,  <Earlj@ncleg.net> <Jerry@ncleg.net>,  <Billo@ncleg.net>,  <Joeb@ncleg.net>,  <Hughh@ncleg.net>,  <Pauls@ncleg.net>, <RayneBrown@triad.rr.com>
Subject:
 

Representative Goforth,
I wanted to thank you and the study commission from the bottom of my heart for your wisdom in offering the bill for moratorium on forced annexations. Although it will probably be too late to help us here in Davidson County even if it does pass, I know that there are so many besieged neighborhoods and communities in North Carolina whom it may help that it would be selfish of me not to offer my thanks, and the thanks of all of us who would lament seeing others suffer the same fate that we will. We are not, as the cities claim, mean or selfish, and we appreciate what you have proposed and pray that it will help others. Please let us know what we can do, as citizens, to help you get this wise and discretionary bill passed.

                         Thanks again, Keith Bost and neighbors – Davidson County

 


-----Original Message-----
From: "mariesthename"
Sent 4/23/2008 8:45:18 AM
To: Cathy@stopncannexation.com
Subject: Re: letter

Thank you so much, Cathy.

Am sending the following letter, via snail mail, to every Senator in NC's Senate:

************************

Good Day,

 

I am writing to you because I can get no answers from the committee that is supposedly addressing a problem that is wreaking havoc statewide.

 

As you know, North Carolina, Tennessee, Idaho, and Kansas are the only states that allow forced annexation at will by cities. Louisiana, Illinois, and Oregon allow it only in limited cases. It should not be allowed at all, for it deprives citizens of their right to vote on something that drastically affects their future.

 

You also know that there is much outrage at the North Carolina Senate for failing and refusing to address the unjust law that has remained in effect since 1959. There are no checks and balances to take away the absolute power that this law furnishes to City Councils who look only to their own will for guidance, thus inviting corruption and abuse.

 

Are you aware, or do you even care, that the League of Municipalities is taking full credit for having stalled 24 bills, which have been in the hands of your Ways and Means Committee since February 2007, for the reform of this law? Aren’t you tired of the League’s spoon fed pabulum of “because areas become urbanized, they need to share in the cost of the city infrastructure so that the city can grow and become a vibrant city”?

 

If forced annexation is the only means whereby a city can grow, then the leaders of that city are lacking in brain power!

 

And look at the problems forced annexation causes: sprawl, lack of adequate police protection, forcing people to live beyond their means with resulting foreclosures on homes that in turn affect the real estate market, a very uncooperative and vengeance minded citizenry, and a tremendous waste of time, talents and money that could be used for better purposes than filling our overcrowded courts with lawsuits fighting a law that should not be allowed to stand.

 

 I would specifically like to know if Senator Andrew Brock’s Bill DRS75044-LBx-104 is still being considered? Or was it ever considered? It was turned over to the Ways and Means Committee over a year ago.

 

Will you please give me some answers.

 

A very concerned citizen, who always votes when a vote is allowed, 

 

Marie Howell

 

-----Original Message-----
From: "Keith and Sherry Bost"
Sent 4/18/2008 10:07:10 PM
To: Bruceg@ncleg.net, Paull@ncleg.net, "'Representative Larry R. Brown'" <Larrybr@ncleg.net>, "'Representative Nelson Dollar'" <Nelsond@ncleg.net>, "'Representative Earl Jones'" <Earlj@ncleg.net>, Louisp@ncleg.net, "'Representative Edgar V. Starnes'" <Edgars@ncleg.net>, Fredst@ncleg.net, "'Representative Russell E. Tucker'" <Russellt@ncleg.net>, "'Representative Trudi Walend'" <Trudiw@ncleg.net>
Cc:
Subject: You were lied to...

 

I hope you remember that I pointed out to you that the claims made (by mayor pro-tem beck and the assistant city manager Carson from Lexington) were false, and below is the actual cost of the sewer that they claimed was “given” to the County school from a selfless “civic duty”. You will find it interesting. I find it unimaginable that City councilmen would have the audacity to lie to the State Representatives, but we here are used to being lied to (and about) by the city of Lexington. I know such propagandized, twisted, and outright avoidance of the truth is common to most if not many Municipal officials and councils.

 

Keith,

Enclosed is the information you requested concerning the sewer expenditure paid by the County for the West Davidson Sewer Project.  Hope this helps.

 

Larry Potts, Chairman
Davidson County Board of Commissioners

 

          Total cost was $1,708,993.15.

The easements were $118,534.00

The capacity charge to City of Lexington was $28,991.78. 

Larry Potts would be honored to answer any of your questions concerning this matter.

 

The city of Salisbury, our neighbor, backed away from its’ plans to annex after finding that the people there requested sewer. Nothing more clearly illustrates the fact that these cities have NO INTENTION of providing service in a timely manner, and that the cities are annexing simply in order to gather tax revenue while taking all the time they want in providing the “promised” services.

Our own City Community Director, Tammy Keply, recently stated in an interview (the Lexington Dispatch) that the “city has two years to provide trunk lines”. Lexington has NO intention of providing anything else. We will have the same fire protection and water service. We have our own streetlights and everything else we want or need. We also have eight people who will lose their homes here, so please declare a moratorium on annexations before this happens.

Thank you very much, Keith Bost and neighbors.


-----Original Message-----
From: "Joni"
Sent 8/1/2007 6:00:45 PM
To: Cathy@stopncannexation.com
Subject: Re: Annexation Reform Study

.....  I am afraid all of this means nothing to me now since we were FORCED into annexation in Winston-Salem....all I see is more taxes to pay and free garbage pickup......we used to take it to the landfill ourselves and it didn't cost me as much as my NEW TAXES are costing me!!!!  God only knows what I will do when they come through with sewer (if I live that long)....how in the heck can I pay for that road frontage at my age (62).....and don't need it or want it in the second place.  Not to mention the darn street lights shining into my bedroom windows now.  Oh, yeah, I love living in the city about as much as I enjoy a migraine.
 
Joni Tilley
 

If you don't mind, I would like to share your email about how annexation has hurt you with legislators as we continue to talk to them.

Cathy Heath

 

Cathy, you go right ahead and tell those "people" how it has hurt me...not helped.  We moved to the county because it was the COUNTY......if we had wanted to live in the city we would have done so. 

 
There are no, I repeat NO, advantages to be annexed other than they get more taxes from us. Let me interject that we are making payments now on the property taxes for 2006 since we just don't have that kind of money...and here it is time to file City-County taxes for this year.  Where am I gonna get another thousand!!!   I didn't care for garbage pick up for free (NOT really free now is it), I didn't want street lights; the country is that because of the near feeling of nature and peace and quiet; the sheriff's department did a fine job of protecting us and was here on the spot when you needed them; we waited an hour a couple of weeks ago when there was an automobile accident right here in my yard....when I called 911 the operator said "hold on and I will get the highway patrol for you" (which tells me their records are not up to date)...I told him "No, that we are the last house in the lovely City Limits and we need the police."....took close to an hour.  Now that was helpful, huh?
 
If I thought it would do any good at all I'd vote next time for anyone that was opposing anyone in office....city, county and federal and state just to get those out that did this to us.  And my vote would  not be for necessarily the best candidate.  I'd vote for the opposer simply because they were not the one in office when this robbery took place.  Robbery is a grand way of explaining it.  They robbed me of what I had, and took much more away, as a thief does.  They (a thief) doesn't give you anything; the thief takes it from you.  They are all thieves.  Each and every one.  So much for the American way.  And don't get me started on illegals....the key word being illegal. 
 
Whew.  I guess I STILL need to vent!  Thanks for listening.  I wish you the best in this task....but it is very difficult to make the government listen to us...and they are supposed to listen.  They are supposed to be our voices and represent us and do what the majority wishes....that doesn't happen.  Lobbyists take care of that.  All I ever wanted was the opportunity to vote on this matter but that won't happen because "they" know that if this ever goes to a public vote, there will never, ever be an annexation in this country!!
 
Most sincerely,
 
Joni Tilley

-----Original Message-----
From: "gloria mc"
Sent 3/15/2008 6:42:35 PM
To:  Cathy@stopncannexation.com
Subject: Re: SNCA Update & Action Alert

Hi Cathy!
 
Thanks for all the updates and important information.
 
Below is an email I sent to all the committee members last week:
 
****************
 
To- Member of the Annexation Study Committee:
 
As a resident living in an area that the City of Asheboro is targeting for annexation, I would like you to consider the implications and repercussions of the present NC Annexation Laws:
 
In order for the City of Asheboro to annex our area, known as Dave's Mountain, the City of Asheboro will spent finite tax revenues to do so. 
Our area is heavily wooded, and VERY rocky, meaning that this will be a VERY expensive project which will take many, many years to pay for -in which  there will be considerable blasting, calling for expensive insurance to cover homeowner's losses, especially to cracked foundations and bringing in expensive equipment to deal with the rock.  The citizens of Asheboro will be financing this foolish venture, with no benefit for the city of Asheboro residents for 20 - 30 years!  This is a debt that will be passed on to our children and grandchildren - and yet the taxpayers of the City are completely in the dark concerning this foolhardy plan.
 
  This is how the City of Asheboro plans to finance this non-voted debt: 
 
  • Using $3-1/2 million dollars of Asheboro taxpayer money, now in reserves, to help pay for Dave’s Mtn. Sewer installation
  • Requiring the Asheboro taxpayer, to assume this sewer debt and spend tax revenues to pay a 20+ year debt*
  • Raising  water and sewer rates to help finance this debt
*This is based on the cost estimate of the project.  When the construction bids are submitted, the cost will most likely be higher according to local sewer installers in our area!
 
The City has manipulated costs and put out a rosy scenario (20 yrs?) so that  this  project will look less ridiculous.  FYI:  To understand how the City has manipulated this whole process, the branch manager of an engineering firm located in Asheboro  was the same gentleman that headed up the City's Task Force on Annexation - who  promoted  this City Annexation and then his company was awarded  engineering contracts for over 1/2 million dollars with no other bids taken!  [A Formal Complaint has been filed with the Board of Professional Engineers and they are now investigating this blatant Conflict of Interest, between the City and the engineering firm]
 
 If I were a taxpayer in the City of Asheboro - I would be knocking down the doors of City Hall saying, "Don't spend my taxes like this!  This is stupid and foolish - especially in this time of economic downturn!!" 
 
But.......as I am sure all of you are aware ......I, my children, and grandchildren are being forced to assume this ridiculous debt, with no voice or vote in the matter!!
 
This, Committee Members, is what is wrong with the current NC Annexation Statutes. 
 
 
 
Gloria McClanahan
Randolph County
 
PS - There are two areas closer to the city than we are who have asked to be annexed and the City has told them that it would be a 10 year pay back which does not make it a prudent financial undertaking for the city!!

-----Original Message-----
From: "BOYD PARKER"
Sent 3/19/2008 8:29:25 PM
To: cathy@stopncannexation.com
Subject: Annexation information

 
Dear  Sir,
My name is Boyd Parker in a small town here in NC that is truly fighting against force annexation here in Bolton nc, We have been annex in a small town that has nothing too offer there people. We as the people in this small community, are wonder how can we not only fight, but win this horribly battle that we are in......
With in this community we are in there are a low percentage that have jobs, most of the people are retired or on disability and the town board think from the heart that he can walk all over these people... IT'S not fair and it's not right...We not only want to join the fight, we are asking for what ever advise that you can give in this long drawn out struggle. Thank you and please contact me at any time.
 
                                                                                  BOYD PARKER......
 
-----Original Message-----
From: "larry wright"
Sent 3/21/2008 3:28:05 PM
To: Cathy@stopncannexation.com
Subject: Re: Information Asheville March 18 meeting


Hi Cathy,
 
Thank you for the info you sent.  Four of us from Rowan County attended and spoke at the Asheville meeting.  The other three were all county commissioners. 

We should have a much larger group from Rowan County at the April 9 meeting in Raleigh - maybe a bus full.

 
I'm not good with attachments so here is my 3 minute speech:
 
"Committee members,  I appreciate the opportunity to speak.
 
I have three points.   The first one is that Salisbury and other cities make the argument that
they must use forced annexation in order to grow.  Let me ask:   Must Rowan county annex
surrounding counties in order  to grow?   Must North Carolina annex surrounding states in order
 to grow?  Clearly the answer to both questions is NO.
 
Both Rowan County and our State  will grow by effectively and efficiently governing within their
current borders.   Salisbury and  other cities can and should do the same.
 
My second point is that forced annexation  is wasteful.   Salisbury will  spend millions of tax
dollars duplicating services  already provided by our own personal funds.  Do you really think
this duplication of services is a wise use of tax funds?
 
 We have learned   recently how valuable water really is.   If annexed, Salisbury will have to
 pump more water from the Yadkin River and we will have to disconnect our wells. Is wasting this
valuable water resource wise in a time of severe draught?   Future draughts may be worse.
 
 Millions of dollars in tax funds and private funds are being spent in costly ligation as agrieved
 citizens and cities fight over forced annexation. This waste can be avoided if the law is changed.
 
My third point is  this current annexation law should be changed because it tramples on the
 rights of North Carolina citizens.  It subjects us to taxation without representation.   It allows
 cities to force themselves upon us. We county residents outside the cities can not vote for the
 city councils that impose on us heavy taxes  and fees  that could run as high as $10,000 when
utilities are connected.    On the state level, We  have the right to vote for those making the
 laws that affect us. We should have the right on the local level to vote on annexation, separate
 from the city, before being annexed.
 
  You have it  within your power to change this outdated and oppressive law and give back to us
 the rights that were taken away in 1959.    Once slavery was legal in our state.   But slavery was
 wrong.  Segregation was legal.  But segregation was wrong. Just because forced annexation is
legal does not make it right.  Just as we have changed the other oppressive laws that were wrong,
we should do the same to the current annexation law.
 
I urge you to disregard the voices of highly paid lobbyists and listen instead to
 us common ordinary citizens."
 
Thanks again for your Help, Cathy
 
Larry Wright
 
Rowan County

 -----Original Message-----
From: "Catherine Smith"
Sent 3/25/2008 9:39:50 AM
To: Eddieg@ncleg.net, Pryorg@ncleg.net, Curtisb@ncleg.net, Kennethf@ncleg.net
Cc: Marcb@ncleg.net
Subject: Forced Annexation: Heathwood to Waxhaw...remember Wal-Mart?

Dear Senators Basnight and Goodall and Representatives Blackwood, Furr and
Gibson:

I am contacting you as a concerned resident and constituent who lives in the
Heathwood subdivision in an unincorporated portion of Union County, NC.

We are in a battle to stop the forced annexation of our community by the
Town of Waxhaw. Despite their assertions to the contrary, this hostile
takeover is simply a bid for added revenue without substantive benefit to
our residents. Indeed, they offer us only garbage collection, unwanted
streetlights and police protection, which is already adequately provided by
the Union County Sheriff's department.

Such rampant misuse of power is frequent in this state and must be curtailed
immediately. Your support of HB 86 will send a strong message to local
municipalities that acquisition by force without significant advantages for
residents is without merit.

Please help us in this fight, and stop the madness.

With respect,

Catherine Smith
**********************************************

------ Forwarded Message
From: Catherine Smith
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2008 10:15:10 -0400
To:
Conversation: Heathwood to Waxhaw...remember Wal-Mart?
Subject: Heathwood to Waxhaw...remember Wal-Mart?

To Whom It May Concern:

It seems reprehensible to me that the town of Waxhaw would cherry-pick
properties in order to line their own pockets. The proposed acquisition of
Heathwood is such a case.

It's obvious to anyone who can read a map that they have gone out of their
way to string together adjacent properties in order to acquire Heathwood
within the town fold.

The residents of Heathwood are aware that this strategy has been attempted
before. It has also been legally challenged and defied in courts across
this country.

Waxhaw, we helped you fight Wal-Mart and we won. Make no mistake that our
vigilance in that battle pales in comparison to the fight you have on your
hands now and the outcome will be the same.


Catherine Smith
Heathwood
 

 

John Moore

XXXXXXXXX

New Hill, NC  27562

 

 

April 8th, 2008

 

To:  House Select Committee on Municipal Annexation

 

 

While there is so much potential for municipalities to create wealth, it is ironic that municipalities in North Carolina are allowed by law to not only seize wealth but also destroy it. Municipalities create wealth by efficiently delivering and selling services.  They seize wealth by compelling purchase of undesired services.  They destroy wealth by threatening taxes for something of lesser value.  The House should  stop forced annexation.

 

 

Sincerely,

 

John Moore


----- Original Message -----
From: stewart smith
Sent: Monday, April 14, 2008 4:13 PM
Subject: annexation

 
Annexation Committee Members All
 
I live in an area that is presently under consideration of annexation in May 2009. I have never paid attention to the annexation process until now. After reading general statue 160, I understand the rub, quite well. In this '50ish Edsel approach I understand all quite well.
 
Where are the already given, legal rights of the citizens to be annexed?  Vote for the city council after they annex you without your given right to a prior vote. This violates the one man one vote, Amendment 25 and the civil rights act of 1965.  No referendum allowed prior to annexation either. The state of NC is in the majority minority of three states to this approach in the United States of America. May my God be with you, should a case of this nature should arise from North Carolina and be appealed to the United States Supreme Court. This would cap only a good investagative newspaper report. The General Statue is so archaic it reminds me of something that came out of a Chicago "speak easy" in the 1930's, in the back room.
 
 Our forefathers came here in the early 1600's and this was one of their main concerns. We should not have to do this again and I will not. All of my voting  rights for annexing my property have been taken away by general statue 160, which you are now accessing the validity of. 
 
 Members All, it needs change, which will take time, careful assessment of all parties and then present a new plan. This will take time to present an acceptable statue which will award municipalities the right to expand, under new rules and at the same time take into effect the right of citizens to have a voice and the given right of approval of  access to  taxes, utilities, lighting, curbing, storm drainage in the process prior to annexation, rather than after.
 
A requirement must be that each city or town have on the books a written policy of annexation of services and when they are to be completed. Note that I am not talking about a code I am referring to a   "Policy for all county residents" that are not in the city limits.
 
Citizens are all, at this time, are living in a recession, and depending on the level of a citizens income, the severity. No better time than now to Stop, Look and Listen as a panel to enforce a moratorium on annexation and re-write general statue 160. Not all, but some towns, cities are FORCING annexation at an alarming rate to find a way out of financial distress. Also, they are cherry picking the area to be annexed. As in our situation here, we are being asked to buy the pump for sewer, pay the electricity to power it and pay to hook up to our house because the city does not have the money to place gravity sewer like the rest of the city, and we live in the most sandy region in the county.  Money wise, that is only $2500.00 to be in a city that I had no political say so as to whether I wanted to pay an additional $850. in taxes. Go figure. They too, are strapped for money. These are the problems.
 
Possible answers could be. For sure, do not take a vote or referendum on forced annexation away from the people. It should be there already.
 
The state varies in elevation by a mile or better. I believe this should figure in a solution of sewer and water quality. Different avenues of obtaining electricity.  The elevation of Boone and Sea Level have to be criterion.  Cities  and towns vary by numbers, terrain, highways, and what is good for one is not good for all. As in anything you have the haves and have nots.
 
 As a committee, you are at fault if you continue to let "160" be the rule for all. It is not.
 
The needs in Charlotte are not the exact needs in Asheville or Ocracoke.  Mecklenburg County, and the city of Charlotte should have absolutely nothing to do with the needs of people in the rest of the state. Their needs and their wants are theirs, not mine.
 
 Divide and conquer the problem using valid criterion. Listen to each county, not a region. Tape each one and look at it, at you leisure. You must get the pulse of ALL the people. Give a list of committee questions to regional experts of the chosen criteria of evaluation, in writing or have them taped.
 
I believe, you will be surprised in the variations of the problems of annexation through out the state of North Carolina.  Take your time and get it right the first time.
 
The people in North Carolina, should not be pawns, slaves of a local government when slavery has been abolished and the right to vote stands as the right to vote for elected officials of the state, the county and nation.  Municipalities  are no different.  Or, are going to say, they are?
 
 
Stewart W. Smith
xxxx xxxxxxx St.
Lenoir County
Kinston, NC 28504